Average viewing time
1m 10s
Reviewers were spending too long trying to locate relevant work.

A photography portfolio redesigned around a faster hiring review journey.
While applying for university photography roles, I built a dedicated portfolio in Lovable AI and launched the first version in two weeks during October 2025.
Analytics showed that the site made reviewers work too hard to find relevant photographs. I redesigned the experience around one focused portfolio page, faster image delivery, and stronger trust signals. The result was a shorter review journey and six photography offers.
Analytics revealed friction in the original hiring review journey.
Average viewing time
1m 10s
Reviewers were spending too long trying to locate relevant work.
Application outcome
0 offers
The longer visit did not represent stronger interest in the photography.
At first glance, a longer session could look like positive engagement. However, Lovable analytics showed a 1 minute 10 second average viewing time while the first version generated no offers. Reviewers were taking longer because they had to browse through the website to find relevant photographs, not because they liked the work and wanted to keep exploring.
This role based persona combines the application context with the behaviour indicated by the analytics. It represents a likely reviewer, not a person interviewed for this project.
Responsible for finding a photographer who can cover a university event professionally, represent the institution well, and deliver usable photographs promptly.
Design implication: the first impression must communicate relevance, quality, and reliability within seconds.

Photography genres were split across separate pages. The journey below shows how this structure worked against a reviewer under time pressure.
Opens applications and portfolio links in sequence.
Needs: Recognise basic suitability immediately.
Friction: A large application pool leaves only a few seconds for the first review.
Judges the first screen, visual quality, and loading response.
Needs: See relevant university event photography at once.
Friction: A general studio homepage does not immediately answer whether the photographer fits this event.
Opens Genres, selects a category, scans it, then returns.
Needs: Compare event, people, and social photography quickly.
Friction: Separate genre pages create repeated navigation and page loads.
Looks for consistent results, experience, turnaround, and public feedback.
Needs: Trust that the photographer can deliver professionally.
Friction: Evidence is separated from the photographs and takes more time to locate.
Decides whether to keep the applicant and move to the next application.
Needs: Reach a confident decision with minimal effort.
Friction: Every extra step increases the chance of leaving before seeing the strongest work.
I added a focused portfolio subpage inside the existing 2AM Studio website. I use its direct link in photography applications so reviewers can begin with the most relevant work.
Portfolio subpage
The direct link used in my photography applications.

One continuous gallery brings the strongest selected photographs together. I can adapt the selection to the skills, style, and genres requested in each job description.
One link. Relevant work. No genre detours.
Cloudinary compresses and resizes images, selects efficient formats, and delivers the right asset for each screen through its CDN.
Responsive images. Loading when needed. Pagination. Caching.
I added testimonials and public social posts with client feedback. Google Drive and social profile links provide further evidence of my active engagement with photography.
Testimonials. Public feedback. Photography work and social activity.
Before
Homepage, genre choice, separate gallery, return, repeat.
After
One relevant selection, fast delivery, evidence, contact.
After the redesign, average viewing time fell from approximately 1 minute 10 seconds to 50 seconds. In this context, the reduction is the intended outcome: reviewers can reach and assess relevant work with less navigation and less waiting.
Most importantly, the redesigned portfolio has supported six photography offers so far. This is an observed comparison between the two versions rather than proof that the website alone caused every offer, but it shows that the new experience is better aligned with the way hiring reviewers evaluate portfolios.
Average viewing time with photographs split across genre pages.
Average viewing time with one focused portfolio page relevant to the job.
Less time needed to find and evaluate the relevant photographs.
Photography offers received after launching the redesigned journey.
Measure the first version in Lovable and identify the fragmented review journey
Map hiring reviewers' need to assess relevant photography quickly
Create and curate one /portfolio page around each job description
Optimise responsive image delivery, lazy loading, compression, and caching
Add testimonials and supporting evidence to strengthen trust



For taking the time to explore this project.